PUTRAJAYA, June 28 — The Federal Court today struck out a civil suit filed by Lawyers for Liberty (LFL) against Singapore Home Affairs Minister K. Shanmugam over the rights group’s challenge for a declaration that a "correction” direction issued by the Singapore government could not be enforced against them in Malaysia.

A five-man panel led by Court of Appeal President Tan Sri Abang Iskandar Abang Hashim allowed the Malaysian Attorney General’s (AG) appeal to strike out the suit.

The AG was given leave by the High Court in 2020 to intervene in LFL’s suit against Shanmugam.

In the originating summons, LFL sought an injunction to restrain the Singapore government from enforcing Singapore laws, particularly Singapore’s Protection from Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Act (Pofma), or taking any action against LFL.

In delivering the court’s decision, Justice Abang Iskandar said the suit relates to sovereign or state immunity and the Malaysian Courts are unable to exercise any adjudicative jurisdiction over the acts of a sovereign nation.

Meanwhile, the panel, which included Federal Court judges Tan Sri Nallini Pathmanathan, Datuk Zabariah Mohd Yusof, Datuk Rhodzariah Bujang and Datuk Hanipah Farikullah, dismissed the Malaysian government’s appeal to strike out LFL’s second suit which touches on the group’s rights to express its opinion on any matter in Malaysia and that its right cannot be impeded by the Pofma law.

Justice Abang Iskandar held that the suit did not involve issues of encroachment into state or sovereign immunity but involved Malaysian parties over which the Malaysian courts have the jurisdiction to hear.

He said LFL had expressed concern and sought clarification of their rights of freedom of expression under the Federal Constitution relating to statements made in Malaysia which were the subject matter of Singapore legislation, namely the Pofma law.

"This, in our view, is not obviously and plainly unsustainable,” said Justice Abang Iskandar.

The Singapore government issued a "correction notice” to LFL in 2020 following a press statement released by the group on its website alleging that brutal and unlawful methods were used to execute prisoners in Singapore’s Changi prison.

The Singapore government said the article contained false statements of facts and directed the group to insert a correction notice and failure to comply with the correction direction would amount to an offence under its Pofma law.

LFL did not comply with the correction direction and instead, it proceeded to file two originating summonses in the High Court, one against Shanmugam and the other against the government of Malaysia.

On June 10, 2021, the High Court allowed the Malaysian government and AG’s applications to strike out both suits, but the Court of Appeal on July 20 the following year overturned the decision and ordered the suits to be remitted back to the High Court for full trial.

On May 16 last year, the government of Malaysia and AG were granted leave to appeal to the Federal Court against the appellate court’s decision. The court heard their appeals today online via zoom.

Senior federal counsels Shamsul Bolhassan and Liew Horng Bin appeared for the Malaysian government and AG while lawyers Datuk Gurdial Singh Njiar, Latheefa Koya, Shahid Adli Kamarudin and Abraham Au acted for LFL. — Bernama