Full Story
Advertisement
Headlines
You May Also Like
The Edit
World / 1 h ago
Novo Nordisk says its experimental drug CagriSema has similar side effects to Wegovy
Life / 15 h ago
Juggling five women in one housing complex — Chinese man's four-year scam finally exposed
In case you missed it
Singapore / 21 h ago
Singapore rolls out road trials for self-driving minibuses and logistics vehicles
Singapore / 20 h ago
Singapore crypto exec fired over alleged drink spiking during job interview at HK bar
![In the celebrated case of Datuk Haji Harun bin Haji Idris v Public Prosecutor [1977] 2 MLJ 155, one of the issues raised was that Section 418 of the Criminal Procedure Code (under the provisions of which the case was transferred from the subordinate court to the High Court for trial) was inconsistent with Article 8 of the Federal Constitution and therefore void by virtue of Article 4. — Reuters file pic](https://www.malaymail.com/malaymail/uploads/images/2024/11/05/243346.jpg "In the celebrated case of Datuk Haji Harun bin Haji Idris v Public Prosecutor [1977] 2 MLJ 155, one of the issues raised was that Section 418 of the Criminal Procedure Code (under the provisions of which the case was transferred from the subordinate court to the High Court for trial) was inconsistent with Article 8 of the Federal Constitution and therefore void by virtue of Article 4. — Reuters file pic")
